This is an interesting judgment in which the Court found in favour of owners of a sectional title scheme, inexperienced as they may be in managing a body corporate, rather than extending the appointment of an inefficient Administrator.
This, despite the fact that the scheme's finances were still in an unsatisfactory state. The Court confirmed that the Legislature prefers self administration in schemes and it should exercise its discretion accordingly, where circumstances allow.
INTRODUCTION TO THE SUMMARY OF THIS CASE
The plaintiff was appointed as an Administrator of a sectional title scheme, in terms of the provisions of section 46 of the Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986 (“the STA”). The application was, at the time, brought by the local municipality because of the high amount of the outstanding rates and taxes due to it.