Debt Counseling versus Sequestration


Our attorneys regularly update us on the latest legal matters.  Here is some information that we believe is valuable and informative.  This table outlines the differences between debt counseling and  sequestration.  Due to the newer legislation around debt counseling, it is currently a far more viable option than sequestration.

Debt Counseling
Sequestration
Regulated by the National Credit Act 34 of 2008
Regulated by the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936
Protection procedure – meant to prevent you from losing your assets whilst paying debt
Procedure that liquidates all your assets to pay the debt
Protects debtor (you)
Protects creditors (the people that you owe)
Creditors cannot harass you for funds once you are under debt counseling
Creditors can and will make claims against your estate once insolvency proceedings are entered
Credit providers receive monthly payment in order to pay off debt
Credit providers receive funds if assets are sold and if sufficient proceeds are accumulated from the sale of assets
Consumer may not incur further debt whilst  under debt counseling unless it is shown to be affordable
Insolvent will we unable to incur debt or obtain credit for a period of 10-15 years after obtaining the court order.
Does not cause an actual black listing on your credit report, merely a flag note
Will cause a blacklisting which will remain on the credit report for a period of 15 years
Cheaper procedure and fees are capped and Regulated by the National Credit Regulator
Costly procedure as it is involves litigation

For further information in this regard, please contact Allison.
These FastFacts are distributed as a matter of courtesy to enlighten all our valued clients of recent and interesting developments in the world of Law by MF ATTORNEYS.